Kalau nak diikutkan, memang betul tiada wang 'hilang' dari 1MDB tetapi kita perlu faham bahawa apa yang didakwa oleh Tun Mahathir dan Rafizi Ramli adalah wang 'dilesapkan' melalui layering company termasuk melalui layering company 1MDB yang kemudian menjadi 'anak angkat' MOF, SRC International. Sejumlah wang melalui beberapa syarikat dan akhirnya terus ke akaun kad kredit Najib Razak seperti yang dipaparkan oleh AG pada sidang media lalu.
PAC melalui audit negara merumuskan bahawa wujud imbalance pada akaun 1MDB dan salah urus tadbir yang amat dahsyat. Bagaimana sebuah badan mengurustadbir dana berjumlah berbillion Ringgit mengalami kegagalan urustadbir kewangan yang serius?
PAC sepatutnya tidak hanya meletakkan study boundary pada hanya pada dalaman 1MDB tetapi electronic forensic money trail seperti yang didakwa. PAC mungkin terlalu cepat membuat rumusan sebelum siasatan rentas pesisir dilakukan.
Mungkin Najib tak bersalah didalam skop siasatan kali ini, tapi siasatan yang mungkin melibatkan agensi luar negara mampu berikan fakta sebaliknya. Jangan hanya baca pada headline, tetapi perlu faham scope and boundary siasatan dalam negara serta pengelibatan 1MDB dalam perniagaan luar negara.
Hasil pendengaran PAC:
1. 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) did not have board approval when it paid US$700 million (RM2.72 billion) to Good Star Limited in 2009, a company unrelated to the state investment firm's joint venture with Saudi oil company PetroSaudi International Ltd.
2. US$1 billion that 1MDB had invested in the joint venture
3. US$300 million was transferred to a JP Morgan (Suisse) SA bank account belonging to 1MDB PetroSaudi Ltd, the joint venture company set up in the British Virgin Islands, on September 30, 2009
4. US$700 million went to an RBS Coutts Bank Ltd account, which former 1MDB CEO Datuk Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi testified belonged to Good Star Limited owned by Jho Lo.
5. The PAC report did not mention the owner of Good Star Limited.
6. The Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has found that former 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) chief executive officer Datuk Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi should be held responsible for the "weaknesses and constraints" faced by the state investment arm.
7. "We urge the authorities to conduct an investigation on Shahrol and those related,"
8. "1MDB should have implemented 'best practices' in their management."
9. "After looking through the final reports by the Auditor-General Department and PAC proceedings, we have found that the management and the board of directors was weak.
10. "The management had repeatedly not complied with decisions and orders made by the board of directors or the management took its own decisions before going though it with the board of directors,"
11. There were also a few investments and huge loans secured that were done without proper valuation and its impact on the company's cash flow
What else should I say?
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan